Wednesday, August 28, 2013

At a podium with pathetic RNC Chmn. Priebus, GOP Rep. Sensenbrenner (R-Wisc.) said he wanted to fix what Supreme Ct. did to Voting Rights Act. Wash. Post and PJ Media report, RNC hoppin' mad, maybe embarrassed, but their enthusiasm for fed. oversight isn't new

.
Below the J. Christian Adams PJ Media article is another PJ Media article filed a few hours later. Some clarifying remarks are made about Sensenbrenner but overall the impact is if anything worse. GOP big wigs are obsessed with getting us to shut up. They wish democrat voters were their voters:

========================

8/26/13, "GOP Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner pledges to fix Voting Rights Act in 2013," Washington Post, Aaron Blake
================================

Links re: GOP enthusiasm for federal oversight in Adams' last paragraph:

8/27/13, "Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner Vows to Put States Back Under Federal Election Receivership?" J. Christian Adams, PJ Media

"Yesterday, Wisconsin Representative Jim Sensenbrenner shared a podium with RNC Chairman Reince Priebus at an RNC event to dovetail with the weekend commemoration of the March on Washington.  You can watch grainy video of the event here.

There, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wisconsin) had this to say about federal oversight of elections under the Voting Rights Act, matters which would include Texas Voter ID. From the Washington Post: 

"Sensenbrenner said he wants to fix the law so that it is immune to court challenges.

“The first thing we have to do is take the monkey wrench that the court threw in it, out of the Voting Rights Act, and then use that monkey wrench to be able to fix it so that it is alive, well, constitutional and impervious to another challenge that will be filed by the usual suspects.”

The “usual suspects” would be states like Texas and Attorneys General like Alan Wilson (SC).  Wisconsin, Sensenbrenner’s home, was never covered by the preclearance obligations of Section 5.  Federal preclearance powers were abused to the tune of millions of dollars in court sanctions, were used to block election integrity measures like Texas Voter ID and Georgia citizenship verification, and have seen employees inside the DOJ who administered the law commit perjury – and remain unpunished.

When PJ Media reported that efforts were afoot inside the RNC to re-impose federal oversight, RNC officials became volcanic. They sent broadcast emails to conservative bloggers attacking PJ Media and vowing not to cooperate with publications who use anonymous sources and a nom de guerre for writers who are in positions that do not permit their identity to be known – a practice used at both Breitbart and Hot Air also.

Yesterday’s event captured on video provides some factual context to the dispute.

For additional factual context for Tatler’s post, I posted this history of the RNC’s involvement in promoting Section 5 federal oversight.  RNC involvement was essential to renewing the federal oversight obligations in 2006, as I write here.  The history of involvement,  reports from PJ Tatler, and now yesterday’s event with unambiguous statements provide context to the issue of Republican involvement in attacks on election integrity and promotion of absolute federal power over state elections." via Instapundit

=========================
======================== 

This is the 2nd PJ Media article:

8/27/13, "Exclusive: ACLU Lobbyist Behind Sensenbrenner’s Voting Rights Act ‘Fix’," PJ Media, Bryan Preston

"Earlier today, J. Christian Adams reported comments made by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) regarding the Voting Rights Act. Sharing the podium with Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, Sensenbrenner told a Washington audience Monday that he wants to “fix” the part of the law that the Supreme Court recently struck down.

Sensenbrenner said he wants to fix the law so that it is immune to court challenges.

"“The first thing we have to do is take the monkey wrench that the court threw in it, out of the Voting Rights Act, and then use that monkey wrench to be able to fix it so that it is alive, well, constitutional and impervious to another challenge that will be filed by the usual suspects.”

Sensenbrenner has not said publicly which section of the law he seeks to “fix” — Section 3 or Section 4. The latter would put many state election laws back under federal receivership, jeopardizing measures like Texas’ popular voter ID law. Sensenbrenner has also not said publicly who he believes the “usual suspects” are. Sensenbrenner has also not identified which states he believes are so racist that they warrant continued federal supervision with his “fix.”

He has publicly said, on August 22, that he opposes Attorney General Eric Holder’s lawsuit against Texas’ voter ID law under the Voting Rights Act’s Section 2, and that he wants Holder to wait until the law is “fixed.”
“I spoke with Attorney General Holder today and requested that he withdraw his Section 2 lawsuit until there can be a legislative fix of the Voting Rights Act.  The lawsuit would make it much more difficult to pass a bipartisan fix to restore the heart of the VRA that the Supreme Court struck down earlier this year.” 
That could be read as Sensenbrenner not opposing Holder’s lawsuit per se, but opposing it only until Congress can “fix” the VRA.

But what shape would that “fix” take? One clue may be found in who influences Rep. Sensenbrenner on the Voting Rights Act.

According to Open Secrets, Phillip Kiko worked in various capacities around the House Republican leadership until this year. Kiko has a long history working for and lobbying to Rep. Sensenbrenner going back decades. His posts include serving as deputy chief of staff to Rep. Sensenbrenner.
















 Kiko is currently vice chairman the Smith-Free Group, a Washington firm which bills itself as bi-partisan. His lobbying disclosure form tells an interesting story: He is working for the American Civil Liberties Union on the Voting Rights Act.













The ACLU characterized the June 2013 Supreme Court decision striking down Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act as a “huge blow to democracy.” The ACLU says that it is “working with Congress to devise a new formula” for Section 5 pre-clearance.

Worse, Kiko’s lobbying activities are not limited to representing the ACLU. He also lobbies on behalf of the far-left Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.












The LCCHR is a collection of mostly far-left radical groups including the ACLU, People for the American Way, the SEIU and other Big Labor organizations, and the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Phillip Kiko, a self-described conservative,* is working on behalf of these groups as their lobbyist at the same time his former boss, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, works toward a “fix” for the Voting Rights Act."

===========================

Comment: The word 'conservative' as a political description today is mostly used either to fool people or demean them. The statement about the GOP wishing democrat voters were their voters I included at the top of this post is something I heard Rush Limbaugh say a few weeks ago, or an approximate version. I don't have a link at the moment but will look for one later. I'm not sure if Limbaugh thought up the phrase himself but I was glad to hear it and it clarifies years of mess. There's no struggle within the GOP, they just badly want different voters.


.

No comments: