Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Sean Hannity and Fox News Open Borders crew promote 'if only Trump would apologize' line. Free Republic owner and commenters: Yes to Trump, No to apologizing, No to Fox News and No to open borders

.
"I had to turn it off turn it off after Hannity asked one of the haters if Trump did the apology tour would he then be worthy." Free Republic commenter
-----------------

July 20, 2015, Free Republic owner and commenters: Yes to Trump, No to apologizing, No to Fox News and No to open borders:

7/20/15, "Hey Fox News girly men talking heads: Trump apologize?" by Jim Robinson, Free Republic owner, 10:27:29pm

"Never! Vote out the Obama enabling quisling RINO amnesty pimps! Enforce the law!

Secure the borders! 

FUBO!! FUGOPE!!"

==========================

Ten among Free Rep. comments to above post:

======================
  
"To: Jim Robinson
............

I stopped watching the ‘Rove Channel’ ages ago.
...............
3 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:29:57 PM by RushIsMyTeddyBear (I'm fed up.) 
........................... 
===================

To: Jim Robinson
............

I’ve been gorging myself on popcorn while Trump knocks down all the PC sacred cows.
..................

2 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:29:18 PM by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.) 
....................
=============================

To: Crazieman
.......................... 

Yeah, McCain was right about me. I’m CRAZY!!
And this veteran does not need or want an apology from Trump.
And McCain can shove it!!
.............................
7 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:32:18 PM by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
.....................
========================== 

To: Jim Robinson..........

We aren’t asking for much, just enforce existing federal law.
Keep hammering, Mr. Trump and never back down.

.............

9 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:33:30 PM by dainbramaged (Get out of my country now) 
....................
==========================

To: ObozoMustGo2012

I had to turn it off after Hannity asked one of the haters if Trump did the apology tour would he then be worthy. He followed up that bash session with 1% (Rick) Perry for the rest of the hour. Does he even realize most of his audience agree with Trump? Talk about being arrogant and out of touch.

.................
21 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:47:27 PM by bray (Cruz to the White House)" 
............
================
..............
To: bray

I started to watch Hannity but, when Perry came on I clicked over to The Simpsons.

I’m going to watch Orielly... I never watch Oreilly.
I’m watching Trump until he is overexposed or nominated...which ever happens, Trump is quite satifying when he kicks Establishment GOP in their shriveled Red Meatballs.

Cruz 2016
.............
30 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:55:51 PM by right way right (Disclaimer: Not a prophet but I have a pretty good record.) 
............................. 
==================
...........
To: bray
.............. 
It was exactly that...a bash session....pretty astounding to hear this crap on Fox....
------------
23 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:49:18 PM by caww
......................
=============
..............
To: Jim Robinson

No more apologizing. Time to take back our country. We are done playing nice. Bravo to Trump for not backing down. Still hoping to Cruz to victory.
.....................
24 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:51:16 PM by freedom6178
...............
======================== 

To: ObozoMustGo2012
..................

.....”that was the most pathetic display of commentary I’ve ever seen”.....

Exactly....stunning arrogance as well.....note how often they mentioned their fear Trump will go third party.....that would do in Trump immediately. He needs to stay just as he is and expose them all!
..................
26 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:54:06 PM by caww
............... 
==================
............
To: Jim Robinson...
...........

Monitor and posting on their FB pages today. Comments are 90% pro Trump FOX is not listening.
....................

22 posted on 7/20/2015, 10:48:03 PM by hoosiermama..."
...........
==================
===============
..........
Wall St. Journal advocated open borders in 1984:  
...........

"We propose a five-word constitutional amendment: There shall be open borders." (parag. 5):
  
July 3, 1984, "REVIEW and OUTLOOK (Editorial): In Praise of Huddled Masses," Wall Street Journal (Eastern edition) (scroll down)

"Amid the fireworks and picnics as this nation celebrates its independence tomorrow, we hope Americans stop to ask, what is the United States? The question is especially appropriate at this moment in the history of a nation of immigrants; upon returning from its July 4 recess Congress will try to finish work on the Simpson-Mazzoli bill.

The answer to the question is in the first words of our Constitution, “We, the people.” It was the people, and especially new people, who worked this land into a New World. We hope today’s gentlepeople, the descendants of the tired and poor who sought refuge on these shores, can still spare a thought for today’s huddled masses, yearning to be free.

Simpson-Mazzoli, we are repeatedly told, is a carefully crafted compromise. It is in fact an anti-immigration bill. Note well that despite its grant of amnesty for aliens who have been residents long enough, its most outspoken opponents are the Hispanics, who would prefer to live with the present laws. Its constituency is an interesting and perhaps portentous alliance of the “nativist” Americans who still dominate Mountain States politics and the “Club of Rome” elitists of the Boston-Washington corridor.

We can hope that the bill will die in the House-Senate conference, which still must resolve such contentious differences as whether or not to have a program of temporary guest workers for agriculture. If it survives conference, President Reagan would be wise to veto it as antithetical to the national self-confidence his administration has done so much to renew.

If Washington still wants to “do something” about immigration, we propose a five-word constitutional amendment: There shall be open borders. Perhaps this policy is overly ambitious in today’s world, but the U.S. became the world’s envy by trumpeting precisely this kind of heresy. Our greatest heresy is that we believe in people as the great resource of our land. Those who would live in freedom have voted over the centuries with their feet. Wherever the state abused its people, beginning with the Puritan pilgrims and continuing today in places like Ho Chi Minh City and Managua, they’ve aimed for our shores. They — we — have astonished the world with the country’s success.

The nativist patriots scream for “control of the borders. It is nonsense to believe that this unenforceable legislation will provide any such thing. Does anyone want to “control the borders” at the moral expense of a 2,000-mile Berlin Wall with minefields, dogs and machine-gun towers? Those who mouth this slogan forget what America means. They want those of us already safely ensconced to erect giant signs warning: Keep Out, Private Property.

The instinct is seconded by the “zero-sum” mentality that has been intellectually faddish this past decade. More people, the worry runs, will lead to overcrowding; will use up all our “resources,” and will cause unemployment. Trembling no-growthers cry that we’ll never “feed,” “house” or “clothe” all the immigrants — though the immigrants want to feed, house and clothe themselves. In fact, people are the great resource, and so long as we keep our economy free, more people means more growth, the more the merrier. Somehow the Reagan administration at least momentarily adopted the cramped Club-of-Rome vision, forgetting which side of this debate it is supposed to support. Ronald Reagan, we thought, marched to different bywords — “growth,” for example, and “opportunity.”

If anyone doubts that the immigration and growth issue touches the fundamental character of a nation, he should look to recent experience in Europe. Some European governments are taken in by the no-growth nonsense that economic pies no longer grow, and must be sliced. They are actually paying immigrants and guest workers to go home: the Germans pay Turks, the French pay North Africans, the British pay West Indians and Asians. It was this dour view of people as liabilities, not assets, that led to the great European emigration to the U.S. in the first place. Meanwhile, Europe today settles into long-term unemployment for millions while the U.S. economy is booming with new jobs.

The same underlying difference in vision applies in political ideals. The individual is the lightning rod of 20th-century politics. The totalitarians of the Communist Bloc don’t allow their people to leave. The foremost use of the machinery of the state is to wall in the citizens. If we cannot change their regimes, the least we can do is to offer refuge to those of their peoples with the opportunity and courage to arrive here. To do otherwise is to say that the ideals upon which this Republic was founded are spent, that what is left is to negotiate the terms of surrender.

America, above all, is a nation founded upon optimism. The Republic will prosper so long as it does not disavow this taproot. The issue is not what we offer the teeming masses, but what they offer us: their hands, their minds, their spirit, and above all the chance to be true to our own past and our own future."

=============================
..........
6/1/2007, Tom Blumer comments on above 1984 WSJ editorial (scroll past 2007 Peggy Noonan WSJ article on immigration and the Bush admin.):

"She’s Right — And Her Newspaper Is, and Has Been, Wrong (Includes Rerun of WSJ’s 1984 ‘There Shall Be Open Borders’ Editorial)" Bizzy Blog, Tom Blumer

"How inspiring and idealistic it seemed at the time. How naive, simplistic, and dangerous it is and, in retrospect, has always been. Also note how history has proven the Journal oh-so-wrong about Europe’s ultimate failure to control its invading horde.

For 23 years now, the Journal has refused to recognize the dangers of first a few million, then over 10 million, now 12-20 million, and if they get their way (who knows?) perhaps 40 million more illegal people in our midst — many if not most of whom are, at best, NOT interested in assimilation, and some of whom are, and will continue to be, working day and night on our destruction.

The editorialists at the Journal have, as far as I can recall, never budged an inch from “There Shall Be Open Borders.” It’s clear that no amount of reality will cause them to get a grip."
.
========================= 

...........

6/17/2013,Mexico would have died...without the option to send its rural poor-fully one-fifth of its population-to the United States.”..."Syria and Egypt can't be fixed," Asia Times, by Spengler 

=====
June 2014, "Unaccompanied minor"


































"The office of U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) who represents the district including the southern border town of Laredo, provided Business Insider with photos showing just how bad the conditions are at one federal facility where some of these immigrants are being held. Cuellar's office said the photos were taken recently in a Customs and Border Protection facility in south Texas. The congressman's office declined to identify the exact source or location of the photos to protect the source's identity."....6/6/2014, "Sickening Photos Of The Humanitarian Crisis At US Border Detention Centers," Business Insider, Brett LoGiurato
.................. .
========================
............................................

My comment: Why Trump? The GOP E either threw or nullified the last 5 elections: 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, and 2014. In four and a half years he's been able to do so, GOP House Speaker Boehner has refused to allow a standalone, up or down vote to defund ObamaCare to come to the floor.
................
This is how third world toilets operate.

My father didn't spend years of his life fighting World War II to save a third world toilet.

World War II US Air Force pilot and his Stearman biplane; below Dad in his Air Force Uniform in the 1940's.



  • Born in Brooklyn in 1922


Here he is on Mother's Day, 2012. Luckily in 2015 he's still with us. Thanks, Dad.

...................................
............
It will get much worse for Trump assuming he stays in. They thought they had beaten us.



......

No comments: